The comparison of quarantine risk analysis systems project will initially gather and collate information from Australia, Canada, New Zealand, Japan, USA, UK, Chile and Thailand. This helps develop a methodology to analyse the biosecurity risks more effectively, and provide a higher level of confidence to Australia's quarantine risk assessment system.

What is the biosecurity problem?

Currently there is no information on how efficient the Australian import risk assessment system is compared to other risk assessments conducted around the world. Biosecurity Australia needs to know more on this to put confidence in its system. The current system depends on Expert opinion and statistical theory. While this may be best available system to categorise risk, it is well known that opinion is susceptible to bias and possibly misleading prioritisation.

The main outputs of this project are to:

• evaluate the information needed to provide a comprehensive qualitative and subsequent quantitative review of quarantine risk assessment systems
• evaluate and compare qualitatively the different quarantine risk assessment systems
• evaluate how different risk analysis approaches deal with uncertainty, and
• develop standardised measures of effectiveness for these systems, including quantitative assessment.

Who will be the end-users of this research?

The project will deliver directly to Biosecurity Australia. More broadly, the techniques developed in this project may be usable by different areas of the risk analysis community, both within Australia and internationally.

Outcome

Education and training: Increased awareness, knowledge and skills levels of industry personnel, and supply of trained scientists.

Goal

The awareness, knowledge and skill of industry personnel, and supply of trained scientists involved in the supply chain and import/export pathways will be enhanced through education and training.

Indicators of success

Capacity:

New postgraduate scientists are supplied to the plant biosecurity community.

Short courses and workshops are delivered to plant biosecurity research staff and students and industry professionals.

Establishment of new university courses in plant biosecurity.
 

Outcome 

Post-harvest grain biosecurity.

Goal

Maximise the value, integrity, and competitive advantage of Australia’s post-harvest supply chain.

Indicators of success

Economic:

Strategy for extending the useful life of phosphine to support market access outcomes for Australian grains.

Science:

New knowledge underpinning strategies to manage phosphine resistance is accepted by peers through publication.

Policy:

Standardised detection and measurement of resistance to phosphine is accepted by end-users.

Capacity/Collaboration:

Improved phosphine resistance management practice both on-farm and in all sectors of the post-harvest grains supply chain.

Impact/Adoption:

New tools to optimise chemical applications in grain storage are adopted by end users.